Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A single model is developed for the different photoelastic response of Ge-family materials and chalcogen-based molecular solids. If χ^' is the "Gr\"uneisen" parameter for the electronic susceptibility, experiment shows that χ^'<0 for the former group, while χ^'>1 for the latter. In addition, several group IV-VI compounds have 0≤χ^'≤1. In our model the dielectric constant is calculated, within the Drude formalism, using one Penn-Phillips oscillator for Ge-family solids and two for molecular chalcogenides. The model predicts that χ^' should depend linearly on 2ηEg, with Eg the Penn-Phillips gap and dimension-less η determined from experiment. Reliable values of χ^', Eg, and other relevant parameters are tabulated for a large number of materials. New experimental results are also presented for ZnTe. The experimental evidence provides support for the model. A plot of χ^' versus 2ηEg exhibits the predicted linear correlations for materials with χ^'<0 and χ^'>1; the slopes are in excellent agreement with measured band-gap volume derivatives. These correlations pertain to amorphous and crystalline solids alike. For the molecular chalcogenides, it is concluded that band-broadening influences χ^' through a uniform "red shift" of the lower-energy oscillator with respect to the stationary upper oscillator. The observed photoelastic trends are related to bonding topology by analogy with arguments previously applied to phonons. χ^'>1 follows from the bonding strength dichotomy in (3D)-network structures, whereas χ^'0 obtains for covalent 3D-network solids. It is suggested that χ^' can serve as an indicator of network dimensionality for these two cases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weinstein et al. (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: