Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper identifies key capabilities for practice identified by community practitioners who seek to support the re-entry and reintegration in community after imprisonment of young men with mild-to-borderline intellectual impairment. It is based on a recent qualitative study undertaken in south-east Queensland, Australia, drawing on in-depth and semistructured interviews with community practitioners working with this population group that is over-represented in the criminal justice system. Applying the capability approach based on the work of Amartya Sen, the study examined community practitioners’ self-reported engagement with young men with mild-to-borderline intellectual impairment involved in the criminal justice system. The analytical strategy was based on grounded theory and from the findings a set of practitioner capabilities and functionings were developed to guide future work by practitioners who support young men with mild-to-borderline intellectual impairment in community re-entry and reintegration.IMPLICATIONS Systems for community re-integration of young men with mild-to-borderline (MB) intellectual impairment involved in the criminal justice system require revisioning with a view to developing effective practice in engagement.A capabilities framework for community practitioners, informed by research, is required to guide practice in re-entry services for young men with MB intellectual impairment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Catalano et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: