Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper proposes a method that estimates the parameters of a velocity-controlled servo. A proportional-integral controller, which uses only position measurements, closes the loop. The proposed approach uses the steady-state response produced by steps and sine-wave signals; they do not produce high levels of vibration on the servo compared with random signals commonly used with the least squares algorithm; moreover, it relies on simple numerical calculations. The method, which is called in the sequel as the steady-state response method (SSRM), consists of two steps. The first step uses three constant reference inputs in order to identify a constant disturbance and the viscous and Coulomb friction coefficients of the servo. In the second step, the SSRM estimates the servo inertia using a sine wave plus a constant signal as a velocity reference input and employs the estimate of the viscous friction coefficient obtained in the first step. Experiments on a testbed employing a brushless servomotor allow comparing the results obtained using the SSRM and those produced by a standard recursive least squares method (RLSM).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Garrido et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: