In this reply, I argue that the production function proposed by Gruver provides a theoretical foundation for the supply model only in a most trivial case. He proposes a more general alternative which is, however, still very implausible. Furthermore, against Rose and Allison, I argue that small input‐coefficient changes provide an insufficient excuse for using the supply model for impact studies, and I show that employment estimates may be quite different depending on the approach used.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jan Oosterhaven (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: