Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) spectroscopy was used to measure the coordination structure about Cu 2+, Cu 1+, and Br - in water at temperatures up to 325 °C. The hexaaqua Cu 2+ species maintains its distorted octahedral structure up to 325 °C, whereas at higher temperatures, dehydration reactions occur producing CuO. Under reducing conditions, the dibromo Cu 1+ species, [CuBr 2 ] -, is predominant at 200 °C and above for systems having excess Br - . Even for a very high salt concentration of 2.0 m NaBr, only the dibromo Cu 1+ species, [CuBr 2 ] -, is observed with no evidence of higher Br - coordination. For this dibromo-species there are no tightly bound hydration waters in the first shell. In the absence of excess Br -, a monoaqua monobromo Cu 1+ species, [Cu(H 2 O)Br] is observed. For certain systems, both Cu and Br XAFS were acquired, and a global model was used to fit the two independent sets of XAFS data. Thus, the results represent a complete picture of the coordination structure about Cu 1+ including the coordination numbers, distances for the ion−ion and water-ion associations and also a high-quality measurement of the binding strength and amount of disorder (Debye−Waller factor and the anharmonicity) of the Cu 1+ /Br - association. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were used to further explore the structure and the binding forces for the [CuBr 2 ] - species under hydrothermal conditions. We found quantitative agreement for the Cu−Br interactions, but the simulation has difficulty predicting the experimental Cu−H 2 O interaction. In particular, the amount of scattering from the water in the dibromo Cu 1+ complex was highly over-predicted, so that it is clear that simple intermolecular potential models do not adequately capture this structural feature.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fulton et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: