Why the study?
Completeness of resection is critical for retroperitoneal sarcoma and often requires en-bloc major vessel resection, but the relative benefits and disadvantages remained to be summarized.
Does an aggressive surgical approach with vascular resection improve overall survival in patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma compared to tumor resection alone?
Does an aggressive surgical approach with vascular resection improve overall survival in patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma compared to tumor resection alone?
In patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma involving major vessels, en-bloc vascular resection yields similar long-term overall and recurrence-free survival compared to tumor resection alone, suggesting vascular involvement should not preclude curative-intent surgery.
Vascular involvement need not preclude curative RPS resection at expert centers; leaves open survival benefit given observational data only.
Background and aim Surgery is the mainstay of treatment and completeness of surgical resection is critical to achieve local control for retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). En-bloc resection of adjacent organs, including major abdominal vessels, is often required to achieve negative margins. The aim of this review was to summarise the available evidence to assess the relative benefits and disadvantages of an aggressive surgical approach with vascular resection in patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). Methods We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE for relevant studies published from inception up to August 1, 2022. We performed a systematic review of the available studies to assess the safety and long-term survival results of vascular resection for RPS. Results We identified a total of 23 studies for our review. Overall postoperative in-hospital or 30-day mortality rate of patients with primary iliocaval leiomyosarcoma was 3% (11/359), and the major complication rate was 13%. The recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates after the follow-up period varied between 15% and 52%, and the 5-year overall survival (OS) rates ranged from 25–78%. Overall postoperative in-hospital or 30-day mortality rate of patients with RPSs receiving vascular resection was 3%, and the major complication rate was 27%. The RFS rates after the follow-up period were 18–86%, and the 5-year OS rates varied between 50% and 73%. There were no significant differences in the rates of RFS (HR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.74–1.19; p = .945) and OS (HR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.66–1.36; p = .774) between the extended resection group and tumour resection alone group. Conclusions With adequate preparation and proper management, for patients with RPSs involving major vessels, aggressive surgical approach with vascular resection can achieve R0/R1 resection and improve survival.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: