Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study investigates the synergistic effects of interpersonal relationships, social support, and exercise empowerment on promoting physical activity behavior change among 1530 non-athletic university students through a self-determination theory framework. Mixed-methods analysis revealed that social support (β = 0.28, p < 0.001) and exercise empowerment (β = 0.21, p < 0.05) serve as dual mediators, explaining 39 % of variance in behavioral change stages, with their interaction exhibiting synergistic enhancement (ΔR 2 = 0.06, p < 0.05). Path analysis identified three core mechanisms: direct impacts on exercise intention (β = 0.35) and self-efficacy (β = 0.29), indirect mediation of peer network effects on behavioral maintenance (Bootstrap CI: 0.11–0.23), and moderated moderation where relationship quality amplified intervention efficacy (ΔR 2 = 0.09, p < 0.01). Theoretical integration demonstrated that social capital enhances empowerment and intrinsic motivation through interpersonal connections. Practical implications suggest multi-level interventions targeting peer-supported communities (Cohen's d = 0.72), empowerment curricula with autonomy-supportive feedback (d = 0.65), and relationship counseling (d = 0.68) could achieve comparable outcomes to established exercise programs. Despite cross-sectional design limitations and self-reported data, this study innovatively validates latent variable modeling and effect size quantification, providing evidence for integrating social-emotional learning into university health promotion. Methodologically, it advances precision intervention development through validated mechanisms and actionable strategies supported by empirical metrics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lv et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: