Why the study?
Does intraperitoneal CO2 insufflation impair cardiac function in patients undergoing elective abdominal aortic repair?
Does intraperitoneal CO2 insufflation impair cardiac function in patients undergoing elective abdominal aortic repair?
Peritoneal CO2 insufflation during laparoscopic aortic surgery impairs LV and RV systolic functions due to increased afterload.
May warrant hemodynamic caution with CO2 insufflation in aortic repair; leaves open effects on outcomes and need for prospective trials.
The effect of laparoscopy on cardiac function is controversial. We hypothesized that cardiac dysfunction related to increased afterload could be predominant in patients undergoing elective abdominal aortic repair. To test this hypothesis, we conducted a transesophageal echocardiographic study in 15 patients during laparoscopic aortic surgery. We systematically assessed left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) functions. Measurements were obtained in the supine position without pneumoperitoneum and with an intraabdominal pressure of 14 mm Hg. Then, patients were turned to the right lateral position without pneumoperitoneum and intraabdominal pressure was increased to 7 mm Hg and to 14 mm Hg. Pneumoperitoneum induced a 25% arterial blood pressure increase and a 38% increase in LV systolic wall stress. A 25% decrease in LV ejection fraction and an 18% decrease in LV stroke volume were observed, associated with an increase in LV end-systolic volume. LV diastolic function impairment was observed without change in LV end-diastolic volume. Respiratory alterations in superior vena cava diameter were never observed, suggesting that volume status remained optimal. Respiratory changes in RV stroke volume were increased according to intraabdominal pressure and body position, reflecting an increase in RV afterload. In conclusion, peritoneal CO2 insufflation in patients scheduled for laparoscopic aortic surgery could impair LV and RV systolic functions as a consequence of increased afterload.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alfonsi et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: