This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Aim: The VitaK-CAC (vitamin K-coronary artery calcification) trial is a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in patients with pre-existent CAC who were treated for two years with either placebo or the vitamin K2-analogue menaquinone-7 (MK-7). The purpose of the present analysis of the VitaK-CAC trial was to assess the degree of adherence to supplementation with MK-7 during the implementation and persistence phases. Methods: We estimated adherence in three different ways: 1) by pill counts, 2) by measuring plasma levels of MK-7, and 3) by measuring plasma levels of dephosphorylated, uncarboxylated matrix Gla-protein (dp-ucMGP), a marker of the functional bioactivity of vitamin K. Results: Estimated adherence based on pill counts was 90%, but it was lower (80%) when plasma levels of vitamin MK-7 were taken as reference. Changes in dp-ucMGP appeared not to be independent from those of MK-7. Conclusions: We conclude that none of the three methods that we applied in our study is absolutely reliable to estimate adherence to supplementation with MK-7. Yet, the measurement of MK-7 levels provides the best information (the study has been registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01002157).
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vossen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: