Why the study?
Chagas disease is increasingly prevalent in the United States, prompting an evaluation of clinical outcomes including mortality, heart failure, arrhythmias, and heart transplantation in these patients over five years.
Does Chagas-induced non-ischemic cardiomyopathy increase the risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes and mortality compared to other non-ischemic cardiomyopathies in hospitalized adults?
Does Chagas-induced non-ischemic cardiomyopathy increase the risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes and mortality compared to other non-ischemic cardiomyopathies in hospitalized adults?
Chagas-induced non-ischemic cardiomyopathy is associated with a markedly higher risk of cardiogenic shock, ventricular arrhythmias, and need for heart transplantation compared to other non-ischemic cardiomyopathies, highlighting the need for targeted screening and aggressive management in endemic and immigrant populations.
Chagas NICM was associated with higher transplant, VF, and shock risks; leaves open whether targeted screening improves outcomes in endemic populations.
OBJECTIVES: Chagas disease, caused by Trypanosoma cruzi, is a parasitic infection endemic to Latin America and is increasingly prevalent in the United States. This study examines mortality, heart failure, arrhythmias, cardiogenic shock, and the need for heart transplantation in Chagas patients over five years in the United States. METHODS: We selected all non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) patients from the National Inpatient Sample Database from 2016 to 2020 and compared them to Chagas-induced NICM. RESULTS: A total of 783,535 patients had non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM), with 250 cases being secondary to Chagas disease. Chagas NICM was predominantly seen in the Hispanic population. Patients with Chagas NICM have significantly higher odds of receiving a heart transplant (OR 15.48; P<0.05), particularly in the context of a high incidence of cardiogenic shock due to end-stage heart failure or severe myocarditis (OR 2.7; P<0.05). Furthermore, these patients demonstrate a higher incidence of ventricular fibrillation (OR 4.87; P<0.05) and pericardial effusion (OR 3.75; P<0.05) compared to other forms of NICM. They are frequently associated with the need for pacemaker placement (OR 2.80; P<0.05), likely due to ventricular fibrillation and conduction blocks. The odds of in-hospital mortality were similar between patients with Chagas NICM and those with other NICM patients. CONCLUSION: Patients with Chagas cardiomyopathy are more likely to experience cardiogenic shock, ventricular fibrillation, and pericardial effusion. They also face an increased risk of needing an ICD and heart transplant. Further research is necessary on this subject.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Omar Al Wahadneh (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: