Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In contemporary discourse, many struggle to fathom the ability of the Chinese leadership to maintain both economic and social stability despite clear and growing discontent within the Chinese populace. This is not mere good luck, but, rather, good management. Instead of crumbling in the face of widespread protest, as have many other authoritarian regimes, the Chinese leadership utilises Machiavellian methods of managing public discontent to legitimate or strengthen its own rule. In this sense, protest and the ways in which the leadership deals with it are, paradoxically, a driving force behind its overall stability. This essay examines four methods used by the Chinese leadership to respond to protests or petitions, including: the decentralisation of state power; the repression of certain protests and manipulation of facts; the tolerance of and concessions to certain protestors; as well as the cooptation of particularly vehement dissenters. It analyses the ways in which these methods interrelate and how they legitimise the Chinese leadership, ensuring continued stability and the maintenance of China's rise.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sam Osborne (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: