Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional study demonstrates that mental health mediates the impact of adverse health profiles on quality of life in stroke survivors, suggesting targeted psychological support is essential.
Objective This study aimed to identify subgroups of stroke survivors based on multiple-adverse health conditions and determine the potential mediation effects of mental health in their relationship with health-related quality of life. Design A cross-sectional study. Setting Three tertiary hospitals in Tianjin, China. Participants A total of 558 stroke survivors were recruited between March and June 2023. Main measures Multiple-adverse health conditions (multimorbidity, frailty and disability) were assessed using the age-corrected Charlson Comorbidity Index, FRAIL Scale, and Barthel Index. Mental health was measured with Patient Health Questionnaire-4, and health-related quality of life was evaluated using the EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level scale. Latent profile analysis identified subgroups, and mediation analysis explored mental health's role. Results Three subgroups were identified: Mild (65.4%, n = 365), Moderate (17.4%, n = 97), and Severe (17.2%, n = 96). Mediation analysis showed that, compared with the Mild subgroup, survivors in the Moderate subgroup ( β = 0.138, 95% CI: 0.055 to 0.232) and the Severe subgroup ( β = 0.217, 95% CI: 0.113 to 0.316) exhibited worse mental health, and poorer mental health was associated with lower health-related quality of life ( β = −0.119, 95% CI: −0.170 to −0.075). Conclusions This study suggests heterogeneity in multiple-adverse health conditions and indicates that mental health may partially account for the association between these conditions and health-related quality of life in stroke survivors. The findings highlight the need for further research into subgroup-specific interventions—with particular attention to mental health—to determine whether such approaches could improve health-related quality of life.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: