Phenomenological ethnography reveals coffee-shop sociability enhances political awareness while perpetuating social exclusions in Generation Z youth, highlighting the ambivalence of informal spaces.
This dissertation investigates how coffee-shop sociability shapes political subjectivity and everyday citizenship among Generation Z in Medan through a phenomenological ethnographic lens. Based on participant observation in three differentiated coffee shops, 15 interviews with male Generation Z regulars, and conversations with proprietors, this study traces how information moves from TikTok, Instagram, and WhatsApp into face-to-face conversation. Findings show that joking, storytelling, disagreement, and the vernacular address of the ketua create recognition and equality, enabling young men to interpret issues collectively. Yet these spaces also reproduce gender exclusion, class segmentation, hierarchies of knowledge, homophily, and misinformation. Coffee-shop discussions strengthen political awareness but rarely lead to formal participation. A major contribution of this study is the concept of the Ambivalent Political Third Place, which explains how informal urban spaces can simultaneously cultivate political selves and reproduce unequal publicness. The findings advance anthropological debates on youth, digital mediation, masculine conviviality, and everyday citizenship in Indonesia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Taufika et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: