Model evaluation demonstrates improved detection of evasive Windows malware using context-adaptive conformal gating, indicating enhanced defense against disguised cyber threats.
Machine Learning (ML)-based malware detectors perform exceptionally well on standard benchmarks, but their robustness to evasive malware remains fragile. On EMBER2024, strong tree-based models achieve high accuracy on clean test sets yet miss a large number of evasive Windows PE samples. Through SHAP-based explainability, matched error comparisons, feature-family analysis, and margin diagnostics on the validation split, we identify consistent attribution and decision-margin differences between baseline true negatives and false negatives. We further show that false negatives occur at different decision depths, including both near-boundary cases and samples misclassified with high benign confidence. We propose C-GUARD, a context-adaptive conformal gated detector that preserves the optimized high-performing baseline while selectively invoking an auxiliary rescue detector on a targeted subset of baseline negative predictions. C-GUARD combines out-of-fold rescue learning to distinguish baseline false negatives from true negatives with adaptive gating under an explicit false-positive budget. A one-sided intervention rule preserves all baseline malware decisions. On the EMBER2024 standard test set, C-GUARD recovers 178 additional malware samples at the cost of 82 additional false positives. On the evasive challenge set, it recovers 17 additional evasive malware samples.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Imran et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: