Comparative observational study uncovers divergent pandemic employment outcomes across eight countries, indicating national safety nets and job remoteability strongly shape labor disruptions.
The authors study employment outcomes during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic across eight countries exhibiting different case levels and policy responses: the United States, Australia, France, Denmark, Italy, South Korea, Spain, and Sweden. While the proportion of people not-at-work increased in all countries, safety net policies seem to influence whether people remained employed-but-absent from work as opposed to becoming unemployed or leaving the labor force. The authors find large employment decreases among young workers and those who have only a high school degree, and increased labor market disparities in countries with the largest declines in employment. A variety of evidence suggests labor demand was a larger driver of employment declines than labor supply and that stringent social distancing policies reduce employment even in the absence of high case numbers. Job characteristics—face-to-face interactions and the ability to work remotely—were closely related to changes in labor market outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Breunig et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: