Key result
Poor social support linked to ~33% greater physical inactivity odds in adults with cognitive disabilities.
Why the study?
To examine the association between perceived social/emotional support and leisure-time physical activity among U.S. adults with self-reported cognitive disabilities, and explore moderation by age and race.
Does perceived social/emotional support improve leisure-time physical activity in adults with cognitive disabilities?
Cross-Sectional (n=15,326)
Yes
Does perceived social/emotional support improve leisure-time physical activity in adults with cognitive disabilities?
Odds Ratio: 1.33 (95% CI 1.08–1.63)
Higher perceived social and emotional support is associated with greater leisure-time physical activity among adults with cognitive disabilities, with variations by age and race.
I need the paper’s actual results before writing the implication. Searching now.The paper page is up. Opening it for the results and key finding.Should not yet change practice; leaves open whether social-support interventions would increase LTPA in adults with cognitive disability.
Purpose To examine the association between perceived social/emotional support (PSES) and leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) among U.S. adults with self-reported cognitive disabilities, and to explore moderation by age and race. Design Cross-sectional analysis of 2023 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data. Setting U.S., nationally representative telephone survey. Sample 15 326 non-institutionalized adults with self-reported cognitive disability based on a BRFSS item. Measures Primary exposure was self-reported PSES (good, medium, poor). Outcome was LTPA (yes/no). Covariates included race/ethnicity, age, sex, education, smoking status, household income, health insurance, depressive disorder, physical health, and mental health. Analysis Survey-weighted bivariate analyses and multivariable logistic regression examined associations between LTPA and PSES. Adjusted logistic regression models tested the moderating effects of age on association between PSES and LTPA, stratified by race/ethnicity. Results In adjusted models, adults reporting poor vs good support had higher odds of physical inactivity (OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.08-1.63). Significant moderation was observed: among Black adults aged 55-64, poor support was linked to more than 2-fold higher odds of inactivity (poor vs good: OR = 2.79, 95% CI: 1.24-6.32; medium vs good: OR = 2.07, 95% CI: 1.15-3.76); among White adults, associations persisted across multiple age groups. Conclusion Higher PSES was associated with greater LTPA among adults with cognitive disabilities, with variation by age and race. Interventions should integrate culturally tailored support strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chakraborty et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Cognitive disability (n=15,326). Poor perceived social/emotional support vs. Good perceived social/emotional support was evaluated on Physical inactivity (lack of leisure-time physical activity) (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.08-1.63). Poor perceived social/emotional support was associated with higher odds of physical inactivity compared to good support among adults with cognitive disabilities (OR 1.33; 95% CI 1.08-1.63).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: