Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Qualitative analysis reveals federal barriers neutralize state sanctuary protections for immigrant survivors, highlighting institutional structures that reinforce gendered power dynamics.
As U.S. immigration policy changes across presidential administrations, it is critical to examine how these changes shape immigrants’ interactions with the legal system. While immigrants are provided basic rights, many lack access to critical protections. This paper employs an inductive thematic analysis of barriers to immigrant survivors’ access to Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) protections, using Colorado as a critical case study. This analysis demonstrates how even substantial state investment and sanctuary commitments are neutralized by federal legal barriers. Analyzed through a feminist lens, this analysis suggests that even in a state committed to immigrant protection, access to VAWA remains constrained in part because federal immigration law contains institutional structures that reproduce gendered power relations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Graham et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: