Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Scoping review identifies clinical errors and communication failures driving dental implant litigation, highlighting that most malpractice claims are preventable through proper planning and consent.
Background and Objectives: This scoping review aims to synthesize evidence on clinical and non-clinical factors associated with malpractice claims in implant dentistry and to identify strategies for prevention. Materials and Methods: A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science in accordance with PRISMA-ScR guidelines, including peer-reviewed studies published within the last 10 years. Results: Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Clinical causes of litigation included improper implant placement, inferior alveolar nerve injury, lack of osseointegration, peri-implant infection, and the use of inappropriate or outdated implant systems. Non-clinical factors included inadequate informed consent, poor documentation, deviation from the treatment plan, and ineffective communication. Conclusions: Malpractice in implant dentistry is largely preventable. Risk reduction depends on accurate diagnosis, careful treatment planning, adherence to surgical principles, and clear patient communication with appropriate informed consent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Varvara et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: