Observational study reveals distinct climate pathways driving winter-spring wildfires in Chinese forest zones, highlighting the importance of region-specific fire management.
Background Regional climate controls on wildfires in China remain complex due to high spatial heterogeneity and strict suppression policies. Aims This study aims to objectively identify coherent high-activity wildfire regions in China and clarify the climatic pathways regulating wildfire activity during the fire season. Methods We applied an optimized clustering approach to MCD64A1 burned area data (2001–2024) to delineate fire regimes, and used Pearson and partial correlations to analyze regional climate-fire relationships. Key results Two representative high-activity wildfire regions were identified: the Northeast fire regime area (NFR) and the Southwest fire regime area (SFR). Burned area peaks in both regions during February–April, when soil moisture (SM) deficit acts as a proximal control. However, the climatic drivers regulating SM differ between regions. In the NFR, SM is associated with both snow cover and temperature, both governed by February–March Arctic Oscillation (AO) conditions. SM in the SFR is negatively related to temperature, which is positively associated with February–March El Niño conditions. Conclusions Winter-spring wildfires in the NFR are governed by a cryosphere–temperature pathway while in the SFR are dominated by a thermally driven pathway. Implications These distinct climate-fire linkages emphasize the importance of region-specific wildfire research under strict fire suppression policies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: