Critical review reveals flaws in the Mid-Holocene reassessment of Monte Verde II, supporting a Late Pleistocene human occupation around 14.4 thousand years ago.
The late Pleistocene age of Monte Verde II (MV-II), Chile, has been challenged based on a regional geoarchaeological study of Chinchihuapi Creek [Surovell, T., C. Méndez, J.-L. García, C. Lüthens, J. M. Thompson, and C. Latorre. 2026a. “A Mid-Holocene Age for Monte Verde Challenges the Timeline of Human Colonization of South America.” Science 391: 1283–1288]. The authors of that study propose that the early archaeological component at MV-II dates to the middle Holocene. They also claim that the archaeological evidence at MV-II lies in a secondary context. The geological evidence and scenarios they present are flawed and inadequate to support their claim. Instead, evidence from decades of investigation supports a ∼14.4 ka age for MV-II.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Waters et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: