Retrospective cross-sectional study demonstrates high recovery rates in under-five children with severe acute malnutrition, highlighting the efficacy of standard nutritional rehabilitation guidelines.
Introduction: Severe acute malnutrition (SAM) continues to be one of the most important preventable causes of under-five morbidity and mortality in low- and middle-income countries, particularly in South Asia, a significant proportion of which is contributed by India. Nutritional rehabilitation centers (NRCs) deliver standardized care for children with SAM using guidelines derived from the World Health Organization (WHO); however, there is a paucity of data regarding their functioning in Karnataka and Southern India. Aims and Objectives: This study aimed to assess the clinico-epidemiological profile, identify risk factors, and evaluate the treatment outcomes of SAM children admitted to NRC in Kalaburagi. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective record-based cross-sectional study conducted among all under-five children admitted with SAM at the NRC of a tertiary care center in Kalaburagi. Data were collected from the available medical records of 150 admitted children, and analysis was performed using SPSS version 20. Results: Out of the 150 cases analyzed, 51% were boys, with the majority (72%) belonging to the 1–24-month age group. Laboratory findings revealed a high burden of anemia, with 44% of children having moderate-to-severe anemia. Overall, 88% of the children achieved a weight gain of more than 5 g/kg/day prior to discharge. Around 80% of admitted SAM children were discharged with an improvement in their grade of malnutrition. Conclusion: Hospital-based management of SAM children in NRC with adherence to the updated WHO standard guidelines has helped in reducing mortality and morbidity among undernourished children.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sreeshyam et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: