Laboratory analysis reveals variable quartz extraction efficiency in loess sediment samples, indicating that standard protocol yields differ despite identical preparation steps.
Quartz purity is essential for reliable optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dating, yet the mineralogical evolution of sediment samples during extraction is rarely documented at each preparation stage. This study uses scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDS) to characterise two loess samples from the Urluia section, Dobrogea, Romania, across sixteen successive stages of a standard OSL quartz extraction protocol. Four compositional indices—the Quartz Purity Index (QPI), Feldspar Contamination Index (FCI), Heavy Mineral Index (HMI), and Carbonate Index (CI)—are introduced to quantify purification efficiency. Each preparation stage played a different role: HCl treatment primarily removed carbonates, grain-size separation and density fractionation reduced heavy minerals by ~99%, and feldspar removal resulted from the combined effects of density separation and HF etching. Despite identical protocols, two samples collected from stratigraphically adjacent positions showed markedly different HF etching efficiencies, reaching ~94% and ~66% quartz purity, respectively. However, luminescence measurements showed similarly weak feldspar signals in both samples, with intensities substantially lower than the quartz OSL signal. These results demonstrate that purification efficiency cannot be assumed to be uniform across loess samples in Romania and highlight SEM-EDS as a practical quality-control tool for OSL sample preparation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marti et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: