PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 1, 1995American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology200 citations

Prolonged In Vivo Hypoxia Enhances Nitric Oxide Synthase Type I and Type III Gene Expression in Adult Rat Lung

View Full Paper
PSPhilip W. ShaulANA J NorthTBTimothy S. Brannon

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Prolonged hypoxia in the adult rat causes a decline in endothelium-derived nitric oxide (NO) production in the pulmonary circulation. To evaluate whether this is related to a decrease in endothelial NO synthase (NOS-III) expression, we determined the effects of hypobaric hypoxia (7 or 21 days) on NOS-III gene expression in adult rat lung. Neuronal NOS (NOS-I) expression was also examined; NOS-I has been immunohistochemically localized to rat bronchiolar epithelium. NOS-III and NOS-I mRNA abundance were assessed in reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assays and the proteins were evaluated by immunoblot analysis. After 7 and 21 days of hypoxia, there were increases in the steady-state levels of both NOS-III and NOS-I mRNA, rising 2.7- to 3.0-fold and 2.5- to 2.8-fold, respectively. These findings were confirmed by Northern analyses. In parallel, NOS-III and NOS-I protein abundance were also increased with hypoxia by 3.0- to 3.5-fold and 2.4- to 3.0-fold, respectively. NOS activity detected by 3Harginine to 3Hcitrulline conversion rose 109%. Thus, prolonged in vivo hypoxia causes enhancement of NOS-III and NOS-I gene expression in adult rat lung, indicating that the pulmonary expression of these genes is modulated in vivo. The increase in NOS-III expression does not explain the declines in pulmonary endothelial NO production previously observed following prolonged hypoxia in this model. Alternatively, the fall in NO production may be related to diminished NOS co-factor availability.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shaul et al. (1995) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a8027a5af1974dd55e45067https://doi.org/10.1165/ajrcmb.13.2.7542896
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper