Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The energy transfer mechanisms between Ce3+ and Tb3+ in LaPO4:Ce,Tb nanocrystals have been studied by means of time-resolved luminescence spectroscopy in a wide temperature range (10–300 K). Special attention was paid to detailed comparative analysis of both rise and decay emission components of both Ce3+ and Tb3+. Surprisingly, a relatively slow rise (several microseconds) of Tb3+ emission under 266-nm laser excitation was detected, which corresponds to the 4f–5d transition of Ce3+ in LaPO4. It was shown that this rise of Tb3+ emission could not have arisen due to relaxation of Ce3+ ions, whose excited state has a lifetime of about 20 ns. It was demonstrated that the generally accepted concept of a resonant energy transfer from Ce3+ to Tb3+ in LaPO4 could not explain the time-resolved luminescence characteristics as well as the observed temperature dependence. Hence, a new concept of the energy transfer process from Ce3+ to Tb3+ in LaPO4 via host lattice states was suggested and elucidated by proposing several possible models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pankratov et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: