Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study was carried out to assess the psychological impact of abnormal cervical smear results. Existing literature contain only uncontrolled studies or controlled studies with non-standardised measures. Subjects were recruited from women attending two general practices for routine cervical smears over a six month period. A comparison was made between women with positive results who were referred for colposcopy, with mild abnormalities who were asked to return for a repeat smear in six months, or negative smear results. Psychometric assessment by postal questionnaire was carried out one week after receiving the result. The measures used were the 28-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28), Spielberger State Anxiety (STAI), and a measure designed specifically for use in the study, the Cervical Screening Questionnaire (CSQ). Results indicated that women with positive smear test results who were referred for colposcopy had significantly higher scores on GHQ (p<.01) STAI-S (p<.05) and CSQ (p<.001) than women with mild abnormalities or negative results. Significant differences between the groups with mild abnormalities and negative results were found on the CSQ (p<.05). These findings suggest that positive results on cervical screening are associated with a significant psychological impact including a range of specific concerns about gynaecological health and cancer, increased anxiety and impaired well-being. Even mildly abnormal results, which involve a recommendation for early repeat screening, cause raised concern about cancer for the recipients. The procedures for providing smear results should be organised to minimise the level of distress.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wardle et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: