Key result
Deactivating life-sustaining cardiac devices at end of life is ethically permissible and requires early communication.
Why the study?
Device deactivation in patients with heart failure represents a growing clinical and ethical challenge as cardiovascular implantable electronic device use expands, with persistent gaps in advance care planning and infrequent deactivation discussions.
This review highlights the ethical permissibility and clinical importance of early communication regarding the deactivation of cardiac devices at the end of life to prevent unnecessary suffering.
May support earlier palliative integration to avert nonbeneficial shocks; leaves open implementation research on deactivation pathways.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Device deactivation in patients with heart failure is an increasingly relevant clinical and ethical challenge as the use of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices expands. RECENT FINDINGS: Current guidelines affirm the ethical and legal permissibility of deactivating life-sustaining devices, including implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, pacemakers, and mechanical circulatory support systems, when requested by patients or surrogates with decision-making capacity. Importantly, guidelines from professional societies recommend that discussions about device deactivation be included in the pre-implantation consent process. However, clinical practice reveals persistent gaps in advance care planning, with device deactivation discussions remaining infrequent. Deactivating implantable cardioverter defibrillators can prevent painful and unnecessary shocks at the end of life, which may otherwise prolong dying without improving quality of life. Multidisciplinary involvement, including palliative care consultation, is essential to support patient-centered decision-making and symptom management. This review synthesizes the latest evidence and consensus on device deactivation in heart failure, emphasizing the need for communication, initiated early in the disease course, as well as individualized care, and integration of patient preferences throughout the disease trajectory.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Courtès et al. (2026) conducted a review in Heart failure. Device deactivation was evaluated. Deactivation of life-sustaining cardiac devices at the end of life is ethically and legally permissible, highlighting the need for early communication and integration of patient preferences.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: