Why the study?
Patients on anticoagulation therapy have an increased bleeding risk, including epistaxis, alongside a lack of available reversal agents for novel oral anticoagulants.
How should epistaxis be managed in patients on novel oral anticoagulation therapy?
How should epistaxis be managed in patients on novel oral anticoagulation therapy?
Patients on NOACs have a higher risk of epistaxis relapse, highlighting the need for specific management guidelines and further research on reversal agents.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May heighten surveillance for recurrent epistaxis in NOAC users; leaves open trials validating reversal agents and management guidelines.
BACKGROUND: Individuals on anticoagulation therapy are at increased risk of bleeding, including epistaxis. There is a lack of available reversal agents for novel oral anticoagulation therapy. OBJECTIVE: This paper reviews the current literature on epistaxis in the context of novel oral anticoagulation use, in order to recommend guidelines on management. METHOD: A comprehensive search of published literature was conducted to identify all relevant articles published up to April 2019. RESULTS: Patients on oral anticoagulation therapy are over-represented in individuals with epistaxis. Those on novel oral anticoagulation therapy were more likely to relapse compared to patients on classic oral anticoagulants or non-anticoagulated patients. Idarucizumab is an effective antidote for bleeding associated with dabigatran use. Recommendations for epistaxis management in patients on novel oral anticoagulation therapy are outlined. CONCLUSION: Clinicians need to be aware of the potential severity of epistaxis and the increased likelihood of recurrence. High-quality studies are required to determine the efficacy and safety of andexanet alfa and ciraparantag, as well as non-specific reversal agents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ho et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: