Why the study?
Barriers remain to implementing cardiovascular polypills in real-world secondary cardiovascular prevention despite guideline recommendations.
Does the CNIC-Polypill improve cardiovascular risk factor management and adherence compared with monocomponents in patients at very high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease?
Does the CNIC-Polypill improve cardiovascular risk factor management and adherence compared with monocomponents in patients at very high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease?
This expert consensus provides practical algorithms for initiating or switching to the CNIC-polypill to simplify treatment, improve adherence, and optimize outcomes in secondary cardiovascular prevention.
May guide CNIC-polypill switching in secondary-prevention patients who tolerate components; leaves open whether algorithms overcome real-world barriers.
Although the cardiovascular (CV) polypill concept is not new and several guidelines state that a CV polypill should be considered an integral part of a comprehensive CV disease (CVD) prevention strategy, there are still some barriers to its implementation in the real-world setting, mainly in secondary CV prevention. As the CNIC-polypill is the only one approved for secondary CV prevention in patients with atherosclerotic CVD in 27 countries worldwide, a panel of four discussants and 30 participants from 18 countries conveyed in a virtual meeting on April 21, 2022, to discuss key clinical questions regarding the practical use of the CNIC-Polypill and barriers to its implementation.Data presented showed that, although the use of the CV polypill is not explicitly mentioned in the current 2021 European Society of Cardiology guidelines on CVD prevention, it may be used in any patient for secondary CVD prevention tolerating all their components to improve outcomes through different aspects. The favourable results of the Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in the Elderly (SECURE) trial now reinforce this recommendation. The panellists presented algorithms on how to switch from any baseline regimen when starting treatment with the CNIC-polypill in different situations, including patients with hypertension, dyslipidaemia, and a previous CV event; at discharge after a cardiovascular event; in chronic ischemic conditions; and in cases of polypharmacy. The panellists and expert discussants did agree that available studies conducted so far with the CNIC-polypill demonstrate that it is as efficacious as the monocomponents, equipotent drugs, or other therapies; reduces the risk of experiencing recurrent major CV events; improves medication adherence; reduces health care costs and resources compared to patients treated with loose drugs; and the patients prefer it over the multipill strategy.In conclusion, the data presented by the participants provided the evidence behind the use of the CNIC-polypill to help fulfil the goal of encouraging its adoption by physicians.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grigorian-Shamagian et al. (2023) conducted a review in Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. CNIC-Polypill vs. Monocomponents or usual care was evaluated. The expert panel concluded that the CNIC-polypill is as efficacious as monocomponents, improves medication adherence, and reduces the risk of recurrent major cardiovascular events in secondary prevention.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: