This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Growing concerns about the alleged negative outcomes of the consumption of animal-based foods (ABF) lead a number of consumers to demand so-called plant-based meat analogues (PBMAs), which are designed to replicate the sensory and nutritional characteristics of genuine meat. This study aimed to characterize the physiological effects of long-term PBMA consumption by comparing their specific influence on both gut microbiota and fluids (i.e., plasma and urine) with those of conventional beef in a rodent model by using metagenomic and metabolomic tools. Twenty-one Wistar rats were divided into groups and consumed diets made with either wheat- and soy-based meat analogues or beef. The microbiota of PBMA-fed animals showed increased amounts of the harmful genus of gut bacteria, while their metabolomes reflected disturbances in the nitrogen-containing compound metabolism and the presence of potentially harmful metabolites. These results should raise concern and prompt further research into the long-term impact of consumption of PBMAs on health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sánchez-Terrón et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: