Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Twenty-one studies on the cost-efficiency of supported employment were reviewed to answer three questions: (a) ``Is supported employment cost-efficient?'' (b) ``Are supported employees with severe or multiple disabilities cost-efficient?'' and (c) ``Are certain models of supported employment more cost-efficient than others?'' This review concluded that supported employment is eventually cost-efficient from the worker's and taxpayer's perspectives. Further, all supported employees are cost-efficient, however, individuals with mild mental retardation are more cost-efficient than individuals with severe mental retardation. Finally, although literature is sparse, individual placements appear to be the most cost-efficient methods of supported employment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robert Evert Cimera (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: