Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To characterize the humoral immune response to islet antigen 2 (IA-2) in patients with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes (T1D), we compared the profile of epitope- and isotype-specific IA-2 antibodies (IA-2A) between children with a humoral immune response restricted to IA-2 and children with a broad response including insulin autoantibodies (IAA) and antibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase (GADA) in addition to IA-2A. METHODS: The study subjects (n=100) were derived from a consecutive series of 1108 patients from the Finnish Pediatric Diabetes Register (investigators listed in the Appendix). Islet cell antibodies, IAA, GADA, total IA-2A levels, IA-2/IA-2beta epitopes, and isotypes were measured, and human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genotypes were analyzed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups in the frequency or levels of epitope-specific IA-2A. Those with an IA-2-restrictive response tested positive more frequently for IgA-IA-2A (P=0.001), had higher titers of IgE-IA-2A (P=0.025), tested positive for more IA-2A isotypes than the broad responders (P=0.04), and carried the high-risk HLA-(DR4)-DQB1*0302 haplotype more frequently than those with a broad antibody response (P=0.019). CONCLUSIONS: These data show that children with newly diagnosed T1D, who test positive only for IA-2A out of the three molecular antibodies predictive of T1D, have a broader IA-2-specific isotype response and stronger association with the high-risk HLA haplotype than those testing positive for all three molecular antibodies. This may be indicative of a different pathogenetic mechanism in those with their humoral immune response restricted to IA-2 at the time of diagnosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Härkönen et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: