Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The imidazole nucleosides, 4(5)‐bromo‐5(4)‐nitro‐1‐β‐D‐ribofuranosylimidazoles, have been prepared via glycosylation of the trimethylsilylated aglycone, 4(5)‐bromo‐5(4)‐nitroimidazole, with tetra‐ O ‐acetyl‐β‐D‐ribo‐furanose followed by removal of the acetyl protecting groups. The 5‐bromo‐4‐nitro‐1‐β‐D‐ribofuranosylimidazole nucleoside was acetonated to produce 5‐bromo‐4‐nitro‐1‐(2,3‐ O ‐isopropylidene‐β‐D‐ribofuranosyl)‐imidazole which was cyclized to provide the corresponding anhydronucleoside 5,5′‐anhydro‐4‐nitro‐5‐oxo‐1‐(2,3‐ O ‐isopropylidene‐β‐D‐ribofuranosyl)imidazole. Sodium hydrosulfide treatment of 5‐bromo‐4‐nitroimidazole nucleoside provided 5‐mercapto‐4‐nitro‐1‐β‐D‐ribofuranosylimidazole 5‐sodium salt which was alkylated with E ‐1,5‐diiodopent‐1‐ene to yield 5‐( E ‐1‐iodo‐1‐penten‐5‐yl)thio‐4‐nitro‐1‐β‐D‐ribofuranosylimidazole. The corresponding iodine‐125‐labeled compound was prepared similarly using radiolabeled diiodopentene. The 5‐bromo‐4‐nitroimidazole, 5‐mercapto‐4‐nitroimidazole, and 5‐iodopentenylthio‐4‐nitroimidazole nucleosides were cytotoxic to Molt‐3 cells in vitro at concentrations higher than 10 μg/mL. The radiolabeled 5‐iodopentenylthio‐4‐nitroimidazole nucleoside showed 2‐fold higher uptake in a rapidly growing tumor as compared to uptake in a relatively slower growing tumor in mice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hasan et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: