DOACs offer advantages over warfarin for thrombotic disorders, but their clinical management requires ongoing development of specific antidotes and activity calibrators.
Supports DOAC preference in thrombotic disorders; leaves open refinement of antidotes and calibrators.
Thrombotic disorders are treated mostly with Heparin and Warfarin in cases requiring anticoagulation drugs. Due to limitations to these drugs including risk of bleeding and need for regular laboratory monitoring several Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been developed and shown to have more advantages than Warfarin. Nevertheless, these drugs are limited to use in some circumstances. As other anticoagulants, these drugs need to be managed and controlled to cope their over activities. Subsequently, many antidotes have been developed to reverse these DOACs. However, these antidotes are still understudies and need to be fully approved. The assessment of DOACs is developing and several drug-specific calibrators have been developed to measure DOACs activity in plasma.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Denise E. Jackson (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: