Why the study?
Carotid endarterectomy is the gold standard surgical procedure for carotid stenosis, and this study aimed to summarize the most-cited articles and highlight those contributing to evidence-based practice.
A bibliometric analysis of carotid endarterectomy literature reveals that the most impactful publications peaked between 1997 and 2010, shifting focus from surgical outcomes to comparisons with carotid stenting.
May help clinicians locate the 41 most-cited RCTs still guiding CEA; leaves open how research focus will evolve beyond CAS comparisons.
OBJECTIVE: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is the gold standard surgical procedure for managing carotid stenosis due to atherosclerosis and reducing the risk of ischemic stroke. This bibliometric analysis summarizes the most-cited articles on CEA and highlights the contributing articles to today's evidence-based practice. METHODS: A title-specific search using the Scopus database was used to perform the search. Pertinent article-based, journal-based, and author-based parameters were obtained for review. RESULTS: A total of 6,824 articles were published between 1970 and 2020. The top 100 most-cited articles accumulated a total of 54,153 citations with an average citation count (CC) of 541, with only a 4.53% self-citation rate for all authors. The publication trends peaked between 1997 and 2010, in which two-third of the highly cited works were published. The most prolific categories with top citations are the clinical, indications, and management, in a descending order. There were 41 published Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) in the most-cited list. CONCLUSIONS: Citation analysis on carotid endarterectomy has witnessed a marked shift in the publication trends from studying the outcome and complications to comparing carotid stenting with endarterectomy. This analysis is a good introductory article to physicians interested in this topic, as it summarizes the highly impactful articles and enlists the most-cited RCT on CEA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2021 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: