Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this article we argue that, in this specific context, the fundamental element for defining a person as a “migrant in transit” has been an administrative document (the return order) that confirms an infraction (the irregular entry) and provides for the imposition of a coercive measure (returning the migrant to the country of origin or the country from which they came). The interesting thing about the return order is that social practice transcends its formal sanctioning implication, acquiring other meanings, connotations and utilities depending on the moment, becoming a key document in assistance centers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iker Barbero (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: