Key result
Cupping lacked convincing evidence for treating hypertension across 2 included clinical trials (1 RCT and 1 uncontrolled observational study).
Systematic Review
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The objective of this review is to assess the clinical evidence for or against cupping as a treatment for hypertension. We searched the literature using 15 databases from their inception to 30 June 2009, without language restrictions. We included all clinical trials (CTs) of cupping to treat hypertension in human patients. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane criteria. Two CTs met all inclusion criteria. One RCT (randomized CT) assessed the effectiveness of dry cupping on changes in cerebral vascular function compared with drug therapy. Their results suggested significant effect in favor of cupping on vascular compliance and degree of vascular filling. One uncontrolled observational study (UOS) tested wet cupping for acute hypertension and found that a one-time treatment reduced blood pressure. In conclusion, the evidence is not significantly convincing to suggest cupping is effective for treating hypertension. Further research is required to investigate whether it generates any specific effects for that condition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2010) conducted a systematic review in Hypertension. Cupping (dry and wet cupping) vs. Drug therapy or no control was evaluated on Blood pressure reduction and changes in cerebral vascular function (vascular compliance and degree of vascular filling). Cupping lacked convincing evidence for treating hypertension across 2 included clinical trials (1 RCT and 1 uncontrolled observational study).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: