Why the study?
Cardiorespiratory fitness evaluates cardiovascular disease risk, but the association of the novel Japan step test with health risk required confirmation before workplace application.
Is higher cardiorespiratory fitness evaluated by the Japan step test associated with a lower prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk in working adults?
Is higher cardiorespiratory fitness evaluated by the Japan step test associated with a lower prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk in working adults?
Higher cardiorespiratory fitness, as measured by the Japan step test, is inversely associated with the prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk factors among Japanese workers.
May help occupational clinicians flag clustered CVD risks with a 5-min test; leaves open prospective validation before routine workplace use.
OBJECTIVE: Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is an important factor for evaluating cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. We recently developed a novel method (National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Japan step test [JST]) for evaluating CRF in workers; its criterion validity has been investigated. However, its association with health risk must be confirmed before its application in the workplace. Therefore, we aimed to determine the association of JST-evaluated CRF with the prevalence of CVD risk among Japanese workers. METHODS: For CRF evaluation, working adults completed the JST, which comprised a 3-minute stepping exercise and a 2-minute recovery period. Data on CVD risk factors and clinical history were collected through medical certification within 1 year from the date of the JST measurements. Participants were divided into three groups for multiple logistic regression analyses based on the JST values (low, moderate, and high). Odds ratios (ORs) for the prevalence of CVD risk were calculated. RESULTS: We recruited 885 working adults (46.4% women). The prevalence of CVD risk in the total population was 18.6%. When compared to the reference group (low CRF), the ORs for CVD risk prevalence after adjustments for lifestyle factors (smoking status, alcohol consumption status, and exercise habits) were 0.42 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-0.63) and 0.29 (95% CI, 0.18-0.45) for the moderate and high groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: An inverse association was noted between the JST-evaluated CRF and CVD risk prevalence. JST may be helpful for identifying workers at risk for CVD development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
So et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: