Why the study?
Does laparoscopic surgery improve clinical outcomes in elderly patients despite their diminished physiologic reserve?
Does laparoscopic surgery improve clinical outcomes in elderly patients despite their diminished physiologic reserve?
Elderly patients, despite having multi-morbidity and diminished physiologic reserve, may derive the greatest benefit from the minimally invasive nature of laparoscopic surgery.
Supports laparoscopic consideration in elderly despite reserve concerns; leaves open prospective RCTs for confirmation.
Populations are aging worldwide, people are living longer, and the surgical needs of elderly patients are rising. Laparoscopic techniques have become more common with improved training, surgeon skill and evidence of improved outcomes. Benefits of laparoscopy include decreased blood loss, postoperative pain, and hospital length of stay; improved mobilization, quicker return to normal activity; and fewer pulmonary, thrombotic, and abdominal wall complications. Indeed, for many common pathologies laparoscopy has become the gold standard, unless contraindicated. It has been questioned as to whether elderly patients can reap the same benefits from laparoscopic surgery. The concern in elderly patients is that physiologic demands may outweigh the benefit seen in younger patients. This question stems from concerns related to longer operative times, increased technical challenge, as well as the impact of physiologic demands of pneumoperitoneum and patient positioning. However, with anesthesia and adequate perioperative cardiac care, there is no evidence that these factors lead to worse clinical outcomes in elderly patients. In contrast, perhaps elderly patients - with increased prevalence of multi-morbidity, geriatric syndromes and diminished physiologic reserve - have the most to gain from a laparoscopic approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chesney et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: