Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate an aggressive surgical strategy in patients with mediastinal sepsis as a result of oesophageal leakage. DESIGN: A prospective clinical study. SETTING: University hospital, Sweden. SUBJECTS: 11 consecutive patients who presented with mediastinal sepsis as a result of a damaged oesophagus caused by instrumental perforation in 4 cases and spontaneous rupture in 6 cases during a 6-year period. INTERVENTIONS: Ten patients were treated with oesophagectomy with a diverting proximal oesophagostomy and in one case a primary cervical oesophagogastrostomy was done after emergency resection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mortality and morbidity. RESULTS: The median delay from onset of symptoms to admission to the unit was 3 days (range 0-6). All patients required artificial ventilation postoperatively and the stay in the ICU amounted to 12.5 days but only 1 patient died during the postoperative course. All patients have subsequently undergone substernal oesophageal replacement with either a gastric tube or a colonic graft. CONCLUSION: Emergency oesophagectomy and proximal deviating oesophagostomy is a salvage procedure for patients with severe fulminant mediastinal sepsis, and it can be done in selected cases with good results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bengt Liedman Lars Lundell (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: