Quasi-experimental study shows a CBT-based psychoeducational program reduces depression in caregivers of individuals with schizophrenia, suggesting sustained mental health benefits.
Caregivers of individuals with schizophrenia face substantial psychological burden, with higher depression rates than the general population. Profamille, a multifamily psychoeducational program offered in France since 1993 and regularly updated, integrates cognitive-behavioral strategies to improve caregivers’ mood and coping skills. Mood was assessed using CES-D-20 and PHQ-9 scales, allowing a distinction between major depressive disorder and other forms of depression, referred to here as subclinical depression. A systematic waiting period between inclusion and program start enables caregivers to prepare and fully engage. We conducted a retrospective analysis of all French groups participating in version V3.2 (2011–2019). Using archival data, we randomly selected two subsamples of participants: a pseudo-control group (i.e., waiting-period control group; N = 1,116) and an active intervention group (N = 1,117). At baseline, in both groups, slightly more than half of caregivers had CES-D scores >16, indicating clinically relevant depressive symptoms. Profamille significantly improved caregivers’ mood: 29% of initially Depressed participants became Non-depressed in the active group versus 8% in controls, and 53% of participants with subclinical depression became Non-depressed versus 25% in controls. Exploratory subgroup analyses suggested a consistent pattern of intervention effects across caregiver and patient characteristics. Non-depressed caregivers maintained stable mood over time, with a trend toward preventive effects compared to the waiting period group. These findings, based on a large retrospective sample with an acceptable missing data rate (12.3%), support the effectiveness, sustainability, and acceptability of Profamille, highlighting its potential to improve caregiver well-being across diverse clinical and demographic contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hodé et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: