Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We have constructed a three-dimensional (3-D) ultrasound scanner to make examinations easier and more accurate. The accuracy of the 3-D scanner has been determined by scanning a three-dimensional model. Lengths, angles, and volume of the model were computed and compared to values determined from physical measurement. Distances between image planes were computed with a mean error of 0.4% of true value. Volume was computed with a mean error of 1.6%, or 0.64 mL +/- 0.72 mL (1 SD). We conclude that the 3-D scanner has a system error of less than 0.4%, that it does not introduce significant new errors, and that the principal source of measurement error is poor lateral resolution due to ultrasound beam width. We believe that the 3-D scanner may be a clinically useful instrument for quantitative echographic measurements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
King et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: