Why the study?
Does dual high on-treatment platelet reactivity (DAPR) increase the risk of adverse atherothrombotic events in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention?
Does dual high on-treatment platelet reactivity (DAPR) increase the risk of adverse atherothrombotic events in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention?
Dual high on-treatment platelet reactivity to aspirin and clopidogrel is present in approximately 20% of patients undergoing elective PCI and is associated with a significantly increased risk of atherothrombotic events at 1 year.
DAPR on VerifyNow was associated with higher post-PCI events; leaves open whether platelet function testing should guide therapy.
AIM: High on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity (HCPR) and high on-aspirin platelet reactivity (HAPR) are associated with atherothrombotic events following coronary stenting. There are, however, few data concerning high on-treatment platelet reactivity to both aspirin and clopidogrel simultaneously. The aim of the present study was to determine the incidence of dual high on-treatment platelet reactivity (DAPR) and its impact on clinical outcome. METHODS: On-treatment platelet reactivity was measured in parallel by ADP- and arachidonic acid-induced light transmittance aggregometry (LTA) (n=921) and the point-of-care VerifyNow system (P2Y12 and aspirin) (n=422) in patients on dual antiplatelet therapy undergoing elective stent implantation. HCPR and HAPR were established by receiver-operator characteristic curve analysis. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, non-fatal acute myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis and ischaemic stroke at 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: The incidence of DAPR varied between 14.7% and 26.9% depending on the platelet function test used. DAPR, assessed by LTA and the VerifyNow system, was highly associated with an adverse clinical outcome. At 1-year follow-up the primary endpoint occurred more frequently in patients with isolated HCPR (11.7%), isolated HAPR (9.6%) or DAPR (10.7%) compared with patients without high on-treatment platelet reactivity (4.2%, all p<0.01) when platelet function was evaluated with LTA. Using the VerifyNow system, patients exhibiting DAPR had the highest risk for the primary endpoint (17.7% vs 4.1% in patients without high on-treatment platelet reactivity, p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention, DAPR to aspirin and clopidogrel is present in one in five patients and is associated with a high risk for atherothrombotic events. DAPR measured by the point-of-care VerifyNow system has a higher predictability for atherothrombotic events than LTA. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00352014.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Breet et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: