Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The present study investigated the impact of sow backfat (BF) thickness at d 109 of gestation (≤10, 11 to 12, 13 to 14, 15 to 16, 17 to 18, 19 to 20, 21 to 22, 23 to 24, 25 to 26 and ≥27 mm) at different parities (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and ≥8) on sow and piglet performance based on records from 11,536 farrowings of 2875 sows. For each parity, an increase in sow BF thickness at d 109 of gestation was associated with (1) a linear decrease (P < 0.05) in sow daily feed intake, (2) a linear increase (P < 0.05) in losses of maternal BF thickness and body weight during the lactation period, and BF gain from weaning to d 109 of subsequent gestation, and (3) a concave down quadratic change (P < 0.05) in litter size and litter gain at weaning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: