Key result
Clinical hypnosis during sutures in pediatric emergencies increased RRI and decreased LF/HF ratio compared to control (p < 0.05), reducing sympathetic cardiac pain reactivity.
Why the study?
It was unclear whether clinical hypnosis modulates autonomic pain responses in children under clinical conditions.
Does clinical hypnosis reduce autonomic cardiac pain reactivity in children undergoing sutures in pediatric emergencies?
Observational (n=42)
Does clinical hypnosis reduce autonomic cardiac pain reactivity in children undergoing sutures in pediatric emergencies?
p-value: p=<0.05
Clinical hypnosis in pediatric emergencies reduces sympathetic cardiac pain reactivity during painful procedures like suturing.
Should not yet change pediatric ED practice; leaves open whether HRV indices can objectively mark hypnotic analgesia.
Pain sensation is characterized by abrupt changes in central nervous system activity producing autonomic reactivity. While clinical hypnosis has demonstrated its benefits for children in pain management, it is not clear whether hypnosis modulated autonomic pain response in children in clinical conditions. Here, we studied autonomic responses under hypnosis to sutures in pediatric emergencies. For that, 42 children (mean age: 6.5 years, range 1.5 to 13) were divided into two groups consecutively (hypnosis and control groups), according to their choice. Time-frequency analysis was applied on RR intervals (heart rate interbeat intervals, or RRI) to estimate parasympathetic reactivity based on high frequency power (HF) and the Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI®) and on sympathetic reactivity (low frequency power [LF]) and LF/HF ratio). We observed that RRI and LF/HF ratio varied according to suture and hypnosis (p < 0.05): RRI was higher and LF/HF ratio was lower during sutures in the hypnosis group in comparison to the control group whereas HF and ANI® increased only during hypnosis. To conclude, hypnosis in pediatric emergencies reduces sympathetic cardiac pain reactivity and could be a marker of pain relief under hypnosis, while parasympathetic activity seems to be a better marker of hypnosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Excoffier et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Pediatric emergencies requiring sutures (n=42). Clinical hypnosis vs. Control group was evaluated on Autonomic responses (RRI and LF/HF ratio) (p=<0.05). Clinical hypnosis during sutures in pediatric emergencies increased RRI and decreased LF/HF ratio compared to control (p < 0.05), reducing sympathetic cardiac pain reactivity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: