Key result
Ischemia-modified albumin levels did not significantly differ between chronic renal disease patients who developed acute coronary syndrome and those who did not (0.72 vs 0.71 ABSU, p=0.859), indicating it is not a reliable diagnostic marker in this population.
Why the study?
The study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of ischemia-modified albumin for acute coronary syndromes in chronic renal patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain or equivalent symptoms.
Does Ischemia-Modified Albumin (IMA) measurement improve the diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes in chronic renal patients admitted to the emergency department with chest pain?
Cross-Sectional (n=221)
No
Does Ischemia-Modified Albumin (IMA) measurement improve the diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes in chronic renal patients admitted to the emergency department with chest pain?
Ischemia-Modified Albumin (IMA) levels are elevated in chronic renal disease regardless of the presence of acute coronary syndrome, making it an unreliable biomarker for diagnosing ACS in this population due to low specificity.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports avoiding IMA to diagnose ACS in CKD; leaves open whether any threshold can discriminate ischemia amid renal elevation.
This study aimed to reveal the diagnostic value of Ischemia-Modified Albumin (IMA) in terms of acute coronary syndromes in chronic renal patients admitted to emergency department with chest pain and equivalent symptoms. Methods: Our study is a descriptive cross-sectional research and included 125 chronic renal patients admitted to emergency department with chest pain and/or equivalent symptoms and 96 healthy volunteers as the control group. Results: In our study, acute coronary syndrome (ACS) was detected in 12 (9.6%) of the patients. Mean IMA level was 0.720.17 absorbance units (ABSU) in the group with Chronic renal disease (CRD)+ACS, 0.710.16 ABSU in patients with CRD but without ACS, and 0.470.14 ABSU in the control group. A statistically significant difference was found between the groups. While no difference between chronic renal patients in whom ACS developed and chronic renal patients in whom ACS did not develop was recorded in terms of IMA. IMA value of both patients with CRD and chronic renal patients in whom ACS developed was significantly higher than that of the healthy control group. In our study, no correlation was found between troponin levels and IMA. Conclusion: IMA level increases in both CRD and ACS. Therefore, it was determined that IMA level did not significantly increase although ACS developed depending on already high IMA level in patients with CRD. We believe IMA cannot be safely used for the diagnosis of ACS in patients with CRD due to the low specificity rate and absence of an optimal threshold value.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gökçek et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Chronic Renal Disease and Acute Coronary Syndrome (n=221). Ischemia-Modified Albumin (IMA) vs. Chronic renal disease patients without acute coronary syndrome was evaluated on Mean Ischemia-Modified Albumin (IMA) level in absorbance units (ABSU) (p=0.859). Ischemia-modified albumin levels did not significantly differ between chronic renal disease patients who developed acute coronary syndrome and those who did not (0.72 vs 0.71 ABSU, p=0.859), indicating it is not a reliable diagnostic marker in this population.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: