This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
International agreements call for inclusion of Indigenous and local knowledge in resource management, yet practical approaches remain underdeveloped. We argue that knowledge co-assessment offers a feasible pathway. Drawing on examples from practice in the Arctic, we provide guidance for equitable engagement, communication, and scaling, enhancing legitimacy, inclusivity, and actionable governance.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Danielsen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: