This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Objective: To study the reproductive impact of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy in cis-females with melanoma. Design: Retrospective cross-sectional study that examined the reproductive outcomes of female patients exposed to systemic ICI therapy. Subjects: Cis-female patients, aged 18-40 years, with advanced-stage melanoma and no prior sterilization procedures or exposure to other systemic antineoplastic therapies who underwent treatment with systemic ICI therapy. Exposure: Systemic ICI treatment as first-line, only-line therapy for advanced-stage melanoma. Main Outcome Measures: Menstrual cycle data, contraceptive use, antimüllerian hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone values, and reproductive outcomes (occurrence of pregnancy) during and after ICI exposure. Results: There were 1,755 female patients with melanoma, aged 18-40 years, evaluated at MD Anderson Cancer Center between the years of 2015 and 2022. We identified 49 cis-females who met inclusion criteria. The most common treatment regimen was nivolumab (44.9%). Among 24 patients employing nonhormonal contraception, 79.2% reported regular menstrual cycle length throughout ICI therapy, with amenorrhea attributed to pregnancy or hypophysitis observed in the minority. Eight patients had a total of nine spontaneous conceptions, with two occurring during ICI therapy and seven after therapy. Limited availability of antimüllerian hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone values precluded conclusive analysis of laboratory markers. Conclusion: Study findings suggest minimal short-term reproductive effects of ICI therapy, with most patients maintaining regular menstrual cycles and no occurrences of primary ovarian insufficiency observed. This study contributes reassuring insights into the short-term reproductive effects of ICI therapy, highlighting the preservation of ovarian function and menstrual regularity.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rhodes et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: