Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A fully self-consistent hybrid dRPA (direct random phase approximation) method, named sc-H[γ]dRPA, is presented with γ = 1/3. The exchange potential of the new method contains a fraction γ of nonlocal Hartree-Fock-like exchange besides the exact local Kohn-Sham (KS) exchange potential. The sc-H[γ]dRPA method, in contrast to a straightforward self-consistent dRPA method within the KS formalism, does not suffer from convergence problems for systems with small eigenvalue gaps. Moreover, the sc-H[γ]dRPA method yields distinctively more accurate reaction, isomerization, and transition state energies than other dRPA approaches, e.g., the frequently used non-self-consistent dRPA method using orbitals and eigenvalues from a KS calculation with the exchange-correlation potential of Perdew, Burke, and Ernzerhof (PBE). The sc-H[γ]dRPA method outperforms second-order Møller-Plesset perturbation theory and coupled cluster singles doubles methods while exhibiting a more favorable scaling of computational costs with system size. A value of γ = 1/3 is shown to be a good choice also for a dRPA@PBE[γ] method, which is a non-self-consistent dRPA method using orbitals and eigenvalues from the hybrid PBE0 method with an admixture of γ = 1/3 of exact exchange instead of the 25% of the PBE0 functional. The dRPA@PBE[γ] method yields reaction, isomerization, and transition state energies that are as good as the sc-H[γ]dRPA ones but is computationally simpler and more efficient because it does not require the self-consistent construction of the dRPA correlation potential. The direct sc-H[γ]dRPA, on the other hand, in contrast to all standard density-functional methods, yields qualitatively correct correlation potentials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thierbach et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: