Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Recently, we have constructed a dual-hybrid direct random phase approximation method, called dRPA75, and demonstrated its good performance on reaction energies, barrier heights, and noncovalent interactions of main-group elements. However, this method has also shown significant but quite systematic errors in the computed atomization energies. In this paper, we suggest a constrained spin-component scaling formalism for the dRPA75 method (SCS-dRPA75) in order to overcome the large error in the computed atomization energies, preserving the good performance of this method on spin-unpolarized systems at the same time. The SCS-dRPA75 method with the aug-cc-pVTZ basis set results in an average error lower than 1.5 kcal mol –1 for the entire n -homodesmotic hierarchy of hydrocarbon reactions (RC0–RC5 test sets). The overall performance of this method is better than the related direct random phase approximation-based double-hybrid PWRB95 method on open-shell systems of main-group elements (from the GMTKN30 database) and comparable to the best O ( N 4 )-scaling opposite-spin second-order perturbation theory-based double-hybrid methods like PWPB95-D3 and to the O ( N 5 )-scaling RPAX2@PBEx method, which also includes exchange interactions. Furthermore, it gives well-balanced performance on many types of barrier heights similarly to the best O ( N 5 )-scaling second-order perturbation theory-based or spin-component scaled second-order perturbation theory-based double-hybrid methods such as XYG3 or DSD-PBEhB95. Finally, we show that the SCS-dRPA75 method has reduced self-interaction and delocalization errors compared to the parent dRPA75 method and a slightly smaller static correlation error than the related PWRB95 method.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mezei et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: