Cross-sectional study reveals six symptom subtypes spanning psychiatric and somatic domains in 72,919 adults, indicating that shared transdiagnostic symptoms drive high comorbidity.
BACKGROUND: The mechanisms underlying the high comorbidity between internalizing disorders (IDs) and functional disorders (FDs) remain unclear. This study aimed to identify data-driven subgroups of major depressive disorder (MDD), generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), fibromyalgia (FM), and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) symptoms in the general population, capturing shared symptom patterns while accounting for variation in symptom severity. METHOD: We analyzed cross-sectional data from 72,919 adults in the Dutch Lifelines Cohort Study, randomly divided into training and validation subsets. Twenty-seven ID and FD criteria symptoms were examined using mixed-measurement item response theory models in the training set, with the optimal model validated in the validation set. Class characteristics were assessed through associations with risk factors, ID/FD diagnosis and comorbidity patterns. RESULTS: Six classes best described the data: Healthy (57.5%), Pain (13.8%), Tension/Pain (9.1%), Anxiety (9.0%), Cognition/Fatigue (6.4%), and Depression (4.3%). All classes showed a combination of ID and FD symptoms, with the Cognition/Fatigue and Depression classes being most mixed, and the Pain and Anxiety classes most domain-specific. Transdiagnostic symptoms were highly endorsed across all classes. ID-FD comorbidity was highest in the Cognition/Fatigue and Depression classes, with the Depression class showing the greatest functional impairment. CONCLUSIONS: The identified classes comprised mixed symptoms from multiple disorders, rather than disorder-specific profiles. ID-FD comorbidity may partly result from non-specific defining symptoms lowering the threshold for fulfilling criteria for multiple disorders. Symptom-level evaluation can help identify more homogenous and clinically relevant subgroups. Longitudinal research is needed to clarify underlying mechanisms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saini et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: